Full Consistency Method (FUCOM) for multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM), developed by Dragam Pamucar in 2018 (<doi:10.3390/sym10090393>). The goal of the method is to determine the weights of criteria such that the deviation from full consistency is minimized. Users provide a character vector specifying the ranking of each criterion according to its significance, starting from the criterion expected to have the highest weight to the least significant one. Additionally, users provide a numeric vector specifying the priority values for each criterion. The comparison is made with respect to the first-ranked (most significant) criterion. The function returns the optimized weights for each criterion (summing to 1), the comparative priority (Phi) values, the mathematical transitivity condition (w) value, and the minimum deviation from full consistency (DFC).

Includes the basic implementation of Genie - a hierarchical clustering algorithm that links two point groups in such a way that an inequity measure (namely, the Gini index) of the cluster sizes does not significantly increase above a given threshold. This method most often outperforms many other data segmentation approaches in terms of clustering quality as tested on a wide range of benchmark datasets. At the same time, Genie retains the high speed of the single linkage approach, therefore it is also suitable for analysing larger data sets. For more details see (Gagolewski et al. 2016 <DOI:10.1016/j.ins.2016.05.003>). For an even faster and more feature-rich implementation, including, amongst others, see the genieclust package (Gagolewski, 2021 <DOI:10.1016/j.softx.2021.100722>).

Estimates statistically significant marker combination values within which one immunologically distinctive group (i.e., disease case) is more associated than another group (i.e., healthy control), successively, using various combinations (i.e., "gates") of markers to examine features of cells that may be different between groups. For a two-group comparison, the gateR package uses the spatial relative risk function estimated using the sparr package. Details about the sparr package methods can be found in the tutorial: Davies et al. (2018) <doi:10.1002/sim.7577>. Details about kernel density estimation can be found in J. F. Bithell (1990) <doi:10.1002/sim.4780090616>. More information about relative risk functions using kernel density estimation can be found in J. F. Bithell (1991) <doi:10.1002/sim.4780101112>.

Fits a generalized linear density ratio model (GLDRM). A GLDRM is a semiparametric generalized linear model. In contrast to a GLM, which assumes a particular exponential family distribution, the GLDRM uses a semiparametric likelihood to estimate the reference distribution. The reference distribution may be any discrete, continuous, or mixed exponential family distribution. The model parameters, which include both the regression coefficients and the cdf of the unspecified reference distribution, are estimated by maximizing a semiparametric likelihood. Regression coefficients are estimated with no loss of efficiency, i.e. the asymptotic variance is the same as if the true exponential family distribution were known. Huang (2014) <doi:10.1080/01621459.2013.824892>. Huang and Rathouz (2012) <doi:10.1093/biomet/asr075>. Rathouz and Gao (2008) <doi:10.1093/biostatistics/kxn030>.

This package implements (1) panel cointegration rank tests, (2) estimators for panel vector autoregressive (VAR) models, and (3) identification methods for panel structural vector autoregressive (SVAR) models as described in the accompanying vignette. The implemented functions allow to account for cross-sectional dependence and for structural breaks in the deterministic terms of the VAR processes. Among the large set of functions, particularly noteworthy are those that implement (1) the correlation-augmented inverse normal test on the cointegration rank by Arsova and Oersal (2021, <doi:10.1016/j.ecosta.2020.05.002>), (2) the two-step estimator for pooled cointegrating vectors by Breitung (2005, <doi:10.1081/ETC-200067895>), and (3) the pooled identification based on independent component analysis by Herwartz and Wang (2024, <doi:10.1002/jae.3044>).

It is a toolbox for Sequential Probability Ratio Tests (SPRT), Wald (1945) <doi:10.2134/agronj1947.00021962003900070011x>. SPRTs are applied to the data during the sampling process, ideally after each observation. At any stage, the test will return a decision to either continue sampling or terminate and accept one of the specified hypotheses. The seq_ttest() function performs one-sample, two-sample, and paired t-tests for testing one- and two-sided hypotheses (Schnuerch & Erdfelder (2019) <doi:10.1037/met0000234>). The seq_anova() function allows to perform a sequential one-way fixed effects ANOVA (Steinhilber et al. (2023) <doi:10.31234/osf.io/m64ne>). Learn more about the package by using vignettes "browseVignettes(package = "sprtt")" or go to the website <https://meikesteinhilber.github.io/sprtt/>.

MAPFX is an end-to-end toolbox that pre-processes the raw data from MPC experiments (e.g., BioLegend's LEGENDScreen and BD Lyoplates assays), and further imputes the ‘missing’ infinity markers in the wells without those measurements. The pipeline starts by performing background correction on raw intensities to remove the noise from electronic baseline restoration and fluorescence compensation by adapting a normal-exponential convolution model. Unwanted technical variation, from sources such as well effects, is then removed using a log-normal model with plate, column, and row factors, after which infinity markers are imputed using the informative backbone markers as predictors. The completed dataset can then be used for clustering and other statistical analyses. Additionally, MAPFX can be used to normalise data from FFC assays as well.

This package implements the Bayesian Augmented Control (BAC, a.k.a. Bayesian historical data borrowing) method under clinical trial setting by calling Just Another Gibbs Sampler ('JAGS') software. In addition, the BACCT package evaluates user-specified decision rules by computing the type-I error/power, or probability of correct go/no-go decision at interim look. The evaluation can be presented numerically or graphically. Users need to have JAGS 4.0.0 or newer installed due to a compatibility issue with rjags package. Currently, the package implements the BAC method for binary outcome only. Support for continuous and survival endpoints will be added in future releases. We would like to thank AbbVie's Statistical Innovation group and Clinical Statistics group for their support in developing the BACCT package.

Co-clustering of the rows and columns of a contingency or binary matrix, or double binary matrices and model selection for the number of row and column clusters. Three models are considered: the Poisson latent block model for contingency matrix, the binary latent block model for binary matrix and a new model we develop: the multiple latent block model for double binary matrices. A new procedure named bikm1 is implemented to investigate more efficiently the grid of numbers of clusters. Then, the studied model selection criteria are the integrated completed likelihood (ICL) and the Bayesian integrated likelihood (BIC). Finally, the co-clustering adjusted Rand index (CARI) to measure agreement between co-clustering partitions is implemented. Robert Valerie, Vasseur Yann, Brault Vincent (2021) <doi:10.1007/s00357-020-09379-w>.

This package implements estimation procedures for Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) and Nonlinear ARDL (NARDL) models, which allow researchers to investigate both short- and long-run relationships in time series data under mixed orders of integration. The package supports simultaneous modeling of symmetric and asymmetric regressors, flexible treatment of short-run and long-run asymmetries, and automated equation handling. It includes several cointegration testing approaches such as the Pesaran-Shin-Smith F and t bounds tests, the Banerjee error correction test, and the restricted ECM test, together with diagnostic tools including Wald tests for asymmetry, ARCH tests, and stability procedures (CUSUM and CUSUMQ). Methodological foundations are provided in Pesaran, Shin, and Smith (2001) <doi:10.1016/S0304-4076(01)00049-5> and Shin, Yu, and Greenwood-Nimmo (2014, ISBN:9780123855079).

Identifying important factors from a large number of potentially important factors of a highly nonlinear and computationally expensive black box model is a difficult problem. Xiao, Joseph, and Ray (2022) <doi:10.1080/00401706.2022.2141897> proposed Maximum One-Factor-at-a-Time (MOFAT) designs for doing this. A MOFAT design can be viewed as an improvement to the random one-factor-at-a-time (OFAT) design proposed by Morris (1991) <doi:10.1080/00401706.1991.10484804>. The improvement is achieved by exploiting the connection between Morris screening designs and Monte Carlo-based Sobol designs, and optimizing the design using a space-filling criterion. This work is supported by a U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF) grant CMMI-1921646 <https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=1921646>.

Interactions between different biological entities are crucial for the function of biological systems. In such networks, nodes represent biological elements, such as genes, proteins and microbes, and their interactions can be defined by edges, which can be either binary or weighted. The dysregulation of these networks can be associated with different clinical conditions such as diseases and response to treatments. However, such variations often occur locally and do not concern the whole network. To capture local variations of such networks, we propose multiplex network differential analysis (MNDA). MNDA allows to quantify the variations in the local neighborhood of each node (e.g. gene) between the two given clinical states, and to test for statistical significance of such variation. Yousefi et al. (2023) <doi:10.1101/2023.01.22.525058>.

Providing new german-wide TapeR Models and functions for their evaluation. Included are the most common tree species in Germany (Norway spruce, Scots pine, European larch, Douglas fir, Silver fir as well as European beech, Common/Sessile oak and Red oak). Many other species are mapped to them so that 36 tree species / groups can be processed. Single trees are defined by species code, one or multiple diameters in arbitrary measuring height and tree height. The functions then provide information on diameters along the stem, bark thickness, height of diameters, volume of the total or parts of the trunk and total and component above-ground biomass. It is also possible to calculate assortments from the taper curves. Uncertainty information is provided for diameter, volume and component biomass estimation.

Determining the sample size for adequate power to detect statistical significance is a crucial step at the design stage for high-throughput experiments. Even though a number of methods and tools are available for sample size calculation for microarray and RNA-seq in the context of differential expression (DE), this topic in the field of single-cell RNA sequencing is understudied. Moreover, the unique data characteristics present in scRNA-seq such as sparsity and heterogeneity increase the challenge. We propose POWSC, a simulation-based method, to provide power evaluation and sample size recommendation for single-cell RNA sequencing DE analysis. POWSC consists of a data simulator that creates realistic expression data, and a power assessor that provides a comprehensive evaluation and visualization of the power and sample size relationship.

This package provides a dynamic time warping (DTW) algorithm for stratigraphic alignment, translated into R from the original published MATLAB code by Hay et al. (2019) <doi:10.1130/G46019.1>. The DTW algorithm incorporates two geologically relevant parameters (g and edge) for augmenting the typical DTW cost matrix, allowing for a range of sedimentologic and chronologic conditions to be explored, as well as the generation of an alignment library (as opposed to a single alignment solution). The g parameter relates to the relative sediment accumulation rate between the two time series records, while the edge parameter relates to the amount of total shared time between the records. Note that this algorithm is used for all DTW alignments in the Align Shiny application, detailed in Hagen et al. (in review).

This package provides a new method for identification of clusters of genomic regions within chromosomes. Primarily, it is used for calling clusters of cis-regulatory elements (COREs). CREAM uses genome-wide maps of genomic regions in the tissue or cell type of interest, such as those generated from chromatin-based assays including DNaseI, ATAC or ChIP-Seq. CREAM considers proximity of the elements within chromosomes of a given sample to identify COREs in the following steps: 1) It identifies window size or the maximum allowed distance between the elements within each CORE, 2) It identifies number of elements which should be clustered as a CORE, 3) It calls COREs, 4) It filters the COREs with lowest order which does not pass the threshold considered in the approach.

Application of a Known Biomass Production Model (KBPM): (1) the fitting of KBPM to each stock; (2) the estimation of the effects of environmental variability; (3) the retrospective analysis to identify regime shifts; (4) the estimation of forecasts. For more details see Schaefer (1954) <https://www.iattc.org/GetAttachment/62d510ee-13d0-40f2-847b-0fde415476b8/Vol-1-No-2-1954-SCHAEFER,-MILNER-B-_Some-aspects-of-the-dynamics-of-populations-important-to-the-management-of-the-commercial-marine-fisheries.pdf>, Pella and Tomlinson (1969) <https://www.iattc.org/GetAttachment/9865079c-6ee7-40e2-9e30-c4523ff81ddf/Vol-13-No-3-1969-PELLA,-JEROME-J-,-and-PATRICK-K-TOMLINSON_A-generalized-stock-production-model.pdf> and MacCall (2002) <doi:10.1577/1548-8675(2002)022%3C0272:UOKBPM%3E2.0.CO;2>.

Each function replaces multiple standard R functions. For example, two function calls, Read() and CountAll(), generate summary statistics for all variables in the data frame, plus histograms and bar charts. Other functions provide data aggregation via pivot tables; comprehensive regression, ANOVA, and t-test; visualizations including integrated Violin/Box/Scatter plot for a numerical variable, bar chart, histogram, box plot, density curves, calibrated power curve; reading multiple data formats with the same call; variable labels; time series with aggregation and forecasting; color themes; and Trellis (facet) graphics. Also includes a confirmatory factor analysis of multiple-indicator measurement models, pedagogical routines for data simulation (e.g., Central Limit Theorem), generation and rendering of regression instructions for interpretative output, and both interactive construction of visualizations and interactive visualizations with plotly.

Algorithms compute robust estimators for loss functions in the concave convex (CC) family by the iteratively reweighted convex optimization (IRCO), an extension of the iteratively reweighted least squares (IRLS). The IRCO reduces the weight of the observation that leads to a large loss; it also provides weights to help identify outliers. Applications include robust (penalized) generalized linear models and robust support vector machines. The package also contains penalized Poisson, negative binomial, zero-inflated Poisson, zero-inflated negative binomial regression models and robust models with non-convex loss functions. Wang et al. (2014) <doi:10.1002/sim.6314>, Wang et al. (2015) <doi:10.1002/bimj.201400143>, Wang et al. (2016) <doi:10.1177/0962280214530608>, Wang (2021) <doi:10.1007/s11749-021-00770-2>, Wang (2024) <doi:10.1111/anzs.12409>.

Given the maximum available sample size (N) for an experiment, and the target levels of Type I and II error probabilities, this package designs a modified SPRT (MSPRT). For any designed MSPRT the package can also obtain its operating characteristics and implement the test for a given sequentially observed data. The MSPRT is defined in a manner very similar to Wald's initial proposal. The proposed test has shown evidence of reducing the average sample size required to perform statistical hypothesis tests at specified levels of significance and power. Currently, the package implements one-sample proportion tests, one and two-sample z tests, and one and two-sample t tests. A brief user guidance for this package is provided below. One can also refer to the supplemental information for the same.

This package provides the estimation of a time-dependent covariance matrix of returns with the intended use for portfolio optimization. The package offers methods for determining the optimal number of factors to be used in the covariance estimation, a hypothesis test of time-varying covariance, and user-friendly functions for portfolio optimization and rolling window evaluation. The local PCA method, method for determining the number of factors, and associated hypothesis test are based on Su and Wang (2017) <doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2016.12.004>. The approach to time-varying portfolio optimization follows Fan et al. (2024) <doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2022.08.007>. The regularisation applied to the residual covariance matrix adopts the technique introduced by Chen et al. (2019) <doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2019.04.025>.

This package implements a permutation test method for the weighted quantile sum (WQS) regression, building off the gWQS package (Renzetti et al. <https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=gWQS>). Weighted quantile sum regression is a statistical technique to evaluate the effect of complex exposure mixtures on an outcome (Carrico et al. 2015 <doi:10.1007/s13253-014-0180-3>). The model features a statistical power and Type I error (i.e., false positive) rate trade-off, as there is a machine learning step to determine the weights that optimize the linear model fit. This package provides an alternative method based on a permutation test that should reliably allow for both high power and low false positive rate when utilizing WQS regression (Day et al. 2022 <doi:10.1289/EHP10570>).

Offers a suite of functions to prepare questionnaire data for analysis (perhaps other types of data as well). By data preparation, I mean data analytic tasks to get your raw data ready for statistical modeling (e.g., regression). There are functions to investigate missing data, reshape data, validate responses, recode variables, score questionnaires, center variables, aggregate by groups, shift scores (i.e., leads or lags), etc. It provides functions for both single level and multilevel (i.e., grouped) data. With a few exceptions (e.g., ncases()), functions without an "s" at the end of their primary word (e.g., center_by()) act on atomic vectors, while functions with an "s" at the end of their primary word (e.g., centers_by()) act on multiple columns of a data.frame.

Encapsulates a number of spatially balanced sampling algorithms, namely, Balanced Acceptance Sampling (equal, unequal, seed point, panels), Halton frames (for discretizing a continuous resource), Halton Iterative Partitioning (equal probability) and Simple Random Sampling. Robertson, B. L., Brown, J. A., McDonald, T. and Jaksons, P. (2013) <doi:10.1111/biom.12059>. Robertson, B. L., McDonald, T., Price, C. J. and Brown, J. A. (2017) <doi:10.1016/j.spl.2017.05.004>. Robertson, B. L., McDonald, T., Price, C. J. and Brown, J. A. (2018) <doi:10.1007/s10651-018-0406-6>. Robertson, B. L., van Dam-Bates, P. and Gansell, O. (2021a) <doi:10.1007/s10651-020-00481-1>. Robertson, B. L., Davies, P., Gansell, O., van Dam-Bates, P., McDonald, T. (2025) <doi:10.1111/anzs.12435>.